Skip to main content (Press Enter).
Login
Skip auxiliary navigation (Press Enter).
Contact Us
Code of Conduct
Return to acrpnet.org
Skip main navigation (Press Enter).
Toggle navigation
Home
Communities
My Communities
All Communities
Chapters
Open Forum
Browse
Directory
Discussions
Libraries
Careers
Participate
Get Started
Help
ACRP Online Community FAQs
Events
Upcoming Events
Browse
Blogs
Blog Viewer
Blogs
V1 Fast
By
Joseph Saponaro
posted
05-01-2012 06:11 AM
Like
DSI had this come up at a Sponsor induced audit for a pain mgt. Drug Study trial where they asked me if it were not a violation of GCP to have subjects fast for V1 prior to their signing the ICF. My response was consent is a process; the most proximal is the ad, then the V1, etc.... I explained our process of how to minimize harm and maximize benefit. I enquired if she had knowledge of how to do it better, and she did not. I called the Sponsor to enquire about her and they told me to ignore thi8s silly question.
Joseph Saponaro, MD, DABIM, FACP, CPI, CCI, CCTI, CCRC, CCRP
www.DrugStudy.MD
1 comment
95 views
Permalink
https://community.acrpnet.org/blogs/joseph-saponaro/2012/05/01/v1-fast
Comments
Kristina Cleveland
07-31-2012 11:31 AM
This has come up several times in our practice. I was taught that we can not ask a subject to fast for a visit prior to signing a consent. We can however let them know what would be required at the visit, if they sign consent. In several protocols, this is asked for at screening. We tend to consent and screening the subject on the same day. I talked with the sponsor. Then the sponsor said that we could do the blood work on the next day if they were not fasting.
I hope this helps.
Kristina Cleveland, CCRC
@2026. Association of Clinical Research Professionals. All rights reserved. No part of this community website may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without the written permission of ACRP.
Powered by Higher Logic